DataDriven

ResultsNOLA

Data on City priorities and objectives

Capital Projects

Percent of project milestones achieved on time

Result area:4
Objective:4-1
Strategy:4-1-3
This measure:Percent of project milestones achieved on time
Near target
78.1 percent
Year to date goal:
At least 80 percent

Why is this measure important?

Capital Projects Administration is responsible for managing the construction and rehabilitation of major capital assets such as municipal government buildings, recreation centers, and libraries. This measure captures the timeliness with which those capital improvements are made.

Definitions of key terms

Project: Facilities construction or major repair work. Milestone: Portion of the project life cycle, including pre-design, design, bid and award, construction, contract closeout, and completion.

No measures

Progress in 2018

Note:  16 of 51 active projects were delayed in the second quarter of 2018 for a variety of reasons. These reasons include: delays in contract execution, some caused by personnel changes related to the mayoral transition; changes in project scope requested by City agencies; lack of responsive bids, lack of bids within budget, and bid protests; plan revisions to meet FEMA comments and requirements; extended contract negotiations with consultants; contractor delays; unforeseen environmental issues, including asbestos and termite remediation, that delayed construction; and rising river conditions requiring suspension of construction. Despite these issues, project timeliness was still within 10 percent of target through the first half of 2018.

Progress in 2018

Note:  CPA has experienced challenges advancing projects in the pre-design and procurement phases. Construction phase delays include encountering unforeseen environmental and structural conditions, inclement weather delays and contractor production issues. The implementation of the new ERP system expected to improve pre-design and procurement phase functions. CPA is extending design phase periods for older buildings to improve in the area of identifying unforeseen conditions. CPA is assessing liquidated damages on projects with delays due to the contractor. CPA is hiring additional project managers to level PM workloads to improve project delivery.

No measures

Progress in 2018

Note:  16 of 51 active projects were delayed in the second quarter of 2018 for a variety of reasons. These reasons include: delays in contract execution, some caused by personnel changes related to the mayoral transition; changes in project scope requested by City agencies; lack of responsive bids, lack of bids within budget, and bid protests; plan revisions to meet FEMA comments and requirements; extended contract negotiations with consultants; contractor delays; unforeseen environmental issues, including asbestos and termite remediation, that delayed construction; and rising river conditions requiring suspension of construction. Despite these issues, project timeliness was still within 10 percent of target through the first half of 2018.

Progress in 2018

Note:  CPA has experienced challenges advancing projects in the pre-design and procurement phases. Construction phase delays include encountering unforeseen environmental and structural conditions, inclement weather delays and contractor production issues. The implementation of the new ERP system expected to improve pre-design and procurement phase functions. CPA is extending design phase periods for older buildings to improve in the area of identifying unforeseen conditions. CPA is assessing liquidated damages on projects with delays due to the contractor. CPA is hiring additional project managers to level PM workloads to improve project delivery.

No measures
No measures
No measures

Totals for 2018

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
87.04 percent 68.63 percent

Historical trend